I read an interview with Bill Hilf, yet another Microsoft puppet. He states "When people buy commercial software, really what they’re buying is a guarantee. You’re buying a guarantee that what you have will perform, and has been tested and there’s someone you can call up, and if things go really bad someone’s liable if something doesn’t work. You’re buying this ecosystem of accountability. One of the challenges of open source and really the challenge with the open source business model is: it’s hard to replicate that ecosystem of accountability and that guarantee."

Please, don’t make me laugh, the people who bought Windows Vista, bought a product guaranteed to work and they were assured the product was tested right? Then how come so many people are having problems with Vista?

Well, I know Microsoft don’t care, they sold a lot of copies of their faulty almost non-Operating System. But, then Bill Hilf jumps and say, "One of the challenges of open source and really the challenge with the open source business model is: it’s hard to replicate that ecosystem of accountability and that guarantee." If this is the case then, that we don’t have this "guarantee" in the Linux world, I want to stay without it, so far my Operating System, which I paid $0 for, Arch Linux, is working perfectly, I couldn’t ask for better quality, and what irony, this all comes "with no guarantee".  Using this Operating System I have a normal life, I study a bachelors degree in the area of Networks and Telecommunications, and although challenging I have all my work done on Arch Linux, and live this normal life without, Microsoft Office, Windows or its so-called "guarantee".

I have come to the end of my "rant" against Microsoft’s false advertisements. Thanks for reading.

PS: At least I got a good laugh this morning because of this interview.

Note: I edited this post, so read again, if you care. emoticon